Analysis of Financial Performance Characteristics, Collateral Assessment and Business Type in the Decision to Provide Medium Credit Facilities at BRI Denpasar Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process Method
Downloads
The Covid-19 pandemic caused an increase in commercial bank NPL from 2.6% (2019) to >3% (2020-2022), revealing the ineffectiveness of traditional credit assessment approaches that rely on collateral-heavy approach. This study analyzes the hierarchy of criteria priorities and specific characteristics in medium-sized credit facility decisions at BRI Denpasar using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Quantitative descriptive analytical method with 3-level hierarchical structure: objectives, three main criteria (financial performance, collateral assessment, business type), and seven sub-criteria. Primary data collected from 25 credit officers through pairwise comparison questionnaires, secondary data from 17 medium-sized credit customer companies for 2022-2024 period (ceiling ?Rp25 billion, operating ?3 years). Analysis used geometric mean and SpiceLogic software validation with CR ? 0.1. Results show financial performance dominance (54.8%), followed by business type (24.1%) and collateral assessment (21.1%). Highest sub-criteria: liquidity ratio (22.5%) with optimal Current Ratio 1.5-2.5, profitability ratio (18.0%) with sustainable ROA 8-15%, solvency ratio (14.3%) with DER 0.5-1.5. Business track record (12.0%) prioritized over business sector (10.0%), confirming shift towards character-centric evaluation. Research proves paradigm shift from collateral-heavy to integrated assessment prioritizing defensive financial capability and business integrity. AHP Score formula empirically validated with risk distribution 35.3% low, 29.4% medium, 23.5% high, 11.8% very high, providing objective framework for standardizing applicable medium-sized credit processes.
Copyright (c) 2025 Herry Primatama, Anisah Firli

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.