�
American Journal of Economic and
Management Business
p-ISSN: XXXX-XXXX
�e-ISSN: XXXX-XXXX
Vol.
1 No. 1 November 2022
THE EFFECT OF
GLOBAL CHALLENGE, MANAGERIAL CHALLENGE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGE TO INCREASE
COMPETITIVENESS AND HUMAN RESOURCE PERFORMANCE IN THE COVID-19 ERA
Sulhan Manaf
Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin, Indonesia
Email: [email protected]
Abstract
Globalization has a major influence on the order of human life, so that
society has its own challenges, including competitiveness and the performance
of human resources which are then exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic. This
study aims to determine the effect of global challenges, managerial challenges
and environmental challenges to increase competitiveness and human resource
performance in the Covid-19 era. This study uses a quantitative research method
with a descriptive approach. The data collection technique in this study used a
questionnaire in the form of Google Docs which was distributed to several
social media platforms as well as by exploring journals, books and other
information relevant to the study. The results of the study show that global
challenges, managerial challenges and environmental challenges partially and
simultaneously have a significant effect on increasing the competitiveness and
performance of human resources. The results showed that global challenges and
environmental challenges partially and simultaneously had a significant effect
on increasing competitiveness, while managerial challenges did not have a
partial significant effect but simultaneously had a significant effect. Then
the variable test results of global challenges, managerial challenges and
environmental challenges partially and simultaneously have a significant effect
on improving human resource performance.
Keywords: Global
Challenge, Managerial Challenge, Environmental Challenge, Increasing
Competitiveness, Human Resource Performance
This article is licensed under
a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike
4.0 International
INTRODUCTION
The
rapid progress of science and technology, especially in the field of
transportation and communication, has "narrowed the distance" between
one country and another. Competition is becoming more open and the business
environment is increasingly complex. This condition encourages companies to
prepare themselves to enter the global market (Mulyani, 2002). The
era of globalization provides direction on how a nation is required to have
both comparative advantage and competitive advantage which must lead to the
realization of the nation's competitive power. Unpreparedness to face global
competition which is characterized by competition in quality can result in a
decrease in self-confidence as a nation, a condition which must be avoided (Chadhiq, 2006).
There are various types of
challenges faced in the era of globalization such as Global Challenges,
Managerial Challenges and Environmental Challenges. Global challenges (quality
challenges) are challenges faced by institutions in the context of market
expansion towards global markets as well as efforts to prepare human resources
to work abroad. The next challenge is a social challenge which includes
institutional challenges regarding how to manage diverse employees, changes in
the composition of the workforce, as well as challenges to improve employee
skills or abilities in reading, writing, and ability. Furthermore, the
challenge of high-performance work systems (high performance work system
challenge), which includes challenges faced by companies in order to integrate
new technology with work design. (Chadhiq, 2006). Whereas Managerial challenge is a team-based
leadership development experience where leaders practice their management
skills in realistic scenarios with employees (Abilitie, 2022). Environmental challenges in organizational and
management studies originally referred to the limitations imposed by the
external environment on the survival of organizations. In the last decades of
the 20th century, the term has denoted the survival of organizations and the
natural environment. This transformation occurs simultaneously in corporate
environmental management practices and in organizational and environmental
studies (Orssatto, 2001). This challenge needs to be faced with the preparation and role of human
resource management, including the competitiveness and performance of human
resources Human
Resources Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage, Tenth Global Edition (Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart, & Wright,
2006).
The
role of human resource management has undergone changes in line with the
emergence of various developments. The rapid progress of science and
technology, especially in the field of transportation and communication, has
reduced the distance between nations. Competition is becoming increasingly open
and the business environment is increasingly complex. The role of human
resources that is bigger than before is very necessary. Initially, human
resources that were bigger than before were needed. Originally human resources
were seen as a cost, but now human resources are an investment that must exist
and are an absolute requirement for the ongoing operations of an organization.
In the past, workers were exploited, work relations existed between workers and
employers, but now workers are maintained and are partners in the organization.
The increasing role of human resource management is an unavoidable result of
the various companies that occur. Companies that compete in current competitive
conditions are faced with increasingly competitive, dynamic and uncertain
conditions. Competition and changes that occur require companies to be able to
adapt to changes and developments that occur through company management,
especially those related to global competition issues (Warsono, 2017).
����������� According to Antan in (Pio & Asaloei,
2016) The phenomenon of
business competition that is currently rife, raises new challenges and
opportunities for every company to be able to understand and conceptualize
effective corporate organizational management through the management or
management of Human Resources. Human Resource Management is recognized as a
global issue and an integral part of competitiveness in the globalization
arena. It is undeniable that all problems that arise in the development and
competition of companies that arise originate from humans and can only be
resolved and managed by humans. Therefore, an important concept emerged that
was recognized as the key to excellence in the field of Human Resources, namely
through the right people in the right place at the right time.
This phenomenon was then
exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic which caused many people to be forced to
lay off work, resulting in increased job competition as well. Therefore, in
this competitive era, it is necessary to increase the competitiveness of
individuals and their performance. Based on the background of these problems,
researchers are interested in conducting research with the title "The
Effect of Global Challenges, Managerial Challenges and Environmental Challenges
to Increase Competitiveness and Human Resource Performance in The Covid-19 Era"
RESEARCH METHODS
This
research uses quantitative research methods. Quantitative research method is a
research method that is based on positivistic (concrete data), research data in
the form of numbers that will be measured using statistics as a calculation
test tool, related to the problem under study to produce a conclusion (Sugiyono, 2014). The descriptive approach in this study is intended
to create an objective picture or description of a situation using numbers,
starting from data collection, interpretation of the data as well as the
appearance and results (Arikunto, 2010).
This
research took 100 samples from the population of employees of private companies
in Indonesia using a random sampling technique. The sampling technique of
random sampling is that the sampling of members of the population is carried
out periodically without regard to the existing strata in the population. This
method is used when members of the population are considered homogeneous (Garaika &
Darmanah, 2002). Because of this, it allows
researchers to obtain respondents according to the amount generated.
This research data
collection technique uses a questionnaire in the form of Google Docs which is
distributed to several social media platforms.
H1: Global
Challenge has a significant positive effect on increasing competitiveness
H2: Managerial
Challenge has a significant positive effect on increasing competitiveness
H3: Environmental
challenges have a significant positive effect on increasing competitiveness
H4: Global
Challenge has a significant positive effect on improving the performance of
human resources
H5: Managerial
Challenge has a significant positive effect on improving the performance of
human resources
H6: Environmental
challenges have a significant positive effect on improving human resource
performance
H7: Global
Challenges, Managerial Challenges and Environmental Challenges jointly
influence increased competitiveness
H8 : Global Challenges,
Managerial Challenges and Environmental Challenges jointly affect the
improvement of human resource performance
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
The
validity test is intended to test how well the research instrument measures the
concept that should be measured. The validity test was carried out by
calculating the correlation between the score of each item and the total score
so that the Pearson Correlation value was obtained (Matondang, 2009). The results of
the validity test can be seen in table 1:
Table
1
Validity test
Variabel |
Pearson Correlation |
Sig. (2- tailed) |
Information |
Global Challenges (X1) |
0.682 |
0.000 |
Valid |
Managerial Challenges (X2) |
0.443 |
0.000 |
Valid |
Environmental Challenges (X3) |
0.781 |
0.000 |
Valid |
Competitiveness (Y1) |
0.568 |
0.000 |
Valid |
Human Resource Performance (Y2) |
0.779 |
0.000 |
Valid |
Based
on the data in table 1, it can be seen that all instruments have a Pearson
correlation value greater than r Table = 0.195 (N=100) and a Sig. (2-tailed)
the correlation for all items is 0.000 which is less than 0.05 so that it can
be concluded that all statement items are declared valid.
Reliability
is an index that shows the extent to which a measuring device can be trusted or
relied on. This shows the extent to which the measurement results remain
consistent when done twice or more for the same symptoms, using the same
measuring instrument (Widi, 2011). According to Kendra, a measuring instrument is said
to be reliable if it produces the same results even though measurements have
been made many times (Sugiono, Noerdjanah, & Wahyu, 2020). The criterion used is a construct or variable that
is said to be reliable if it gives a Cronbach Alpha value > 0.6. The results
of the reliability test are presented in Table 2 below
Table
2
Reliability Test
No. |
Variabel |
Cronbach Alpha |
Information |
1 |
Global Challenges (X1) |
0.668 |
Reliabel |
2 |
Managerial Challenges (X2) |
Reliabel |
|
3 |
Environmental Challenges (X3) |
Reliabel |
|
4 |
Competitiveness (Y1) |
Reliabel |
|
5 |
Human Resource Performance (Y2) |
Reliabel |
The t test is an individual partial regression
coefficient test that is used to determine whether the independent variables (X1
and X2) individually affect the dependent variable (Y) (Wardani & Permatasari, 2022). The results of the T test include the following:
����������� Based
on the results of this analysis, a significance t value of 0.004 <0.05 was
obtained and a calculated t value of 2.991 > t table 1.983, then Ho1 was
rejected Ha1 was accepted. So partially it can be concluded that Global
Challenge (X1) has a positive and significant effect on Competitiveness
(Y1).
����������� Based
on the results of this analysis, a significance t value of 0.119 > 0.05 is
obtained and the t value is -1.294 <t table 1.983, so Ho1 is accepted, Ha1
is rejected. So partially it can be concluded that Managerial Challenge (X2)
has no significant effect on Competitiveness (Y1).
����������� Based
on the results of this analysis, a significance t value of 0.000 <0.05 was
obtained and a calculated t value of 4.547 > t table 1.983, then Ho1 was
rejected Ha1 was accepted. So that partially it can be concluded that
Environmental Challenge (X3) has a positive and significant effect
on Competitiveness (Y1).
Based on the results of this
analysis, a significance t value of 0.000 <0.05 was obtained and a
calculated t value of 3.533 > t table 1.983, then Ho1 was rejected Ha1 was
accepted. So partially it can be concluded that Global Challenge (X1)
has a positive and significant effect on Human Resource Performance (Y2).
Based on the results of this
analysis, a significance t value of 0.048 <0.05 was obtained and a
calculated t value of 2.004 > t table 1.983 then Ho1 was rejected Ha1 was
accepted. So partially it can be concluded that Managerial Challenge (X2)
has a positive and significant effect on Human Resource Performance (Y2).
Based on the results of this
analysis, a significance t value of 0.000 <0.05 was obtained and a t count
value of 10.076 > t table 1.983, then Ho1 was rejected Ha1 was accepted. So
partially it can be concluded that Environmental Challenge (X3) has
a positive and significant effect on Human Resource Performance (Y2).
Multiple
linear regression analysis aims to find out and predict whether the independent
variable (X) has an effect on the dependent variable (Y) and how much influence
the three independent variables have on the dependent variable (Y) in this
study (Yusuf, 2017).
In this study, multiple linear
regression tests were used to determine the seventh hypothesis (H7) of the
effect of Global Challenges, Managerial Challenges and Environmental Challenges
together on increasing competitiveness, the results of the study show that:
A significant value was
obtained of 0.00 which is less than 0.05, referring to the decision-making
guidelines, it means that Global Challenges, Managerial Challenges and
Environmental Challenges together have a significant positive effect on
increasing competitiveness.
Then, to answer the eighth
research hypothesis (H8) regarding the influence of Global Challenges,
Managerial Challenges and Environmental Challenges together have an influence
on improving the performance of human resources.
A
significant value was obtained of 0.000 which is less than 0.05, referring to
the decision-making guidelines which means that Global Challenges, Managerial
Challenges and Environmental Challenges together have a significant positive
effect on improving human resources.
CONCLUSION
Based on the
results of the study it can be concluded that:
1.
Partially, it can be concluded that Global Challenge (X1) has
a positive and significant effect on increasing Competitiveness (Y1).
2.
Partially it can be concluded that Managerial Challenge (X2)
has no significant effect on increasing Competitiveness (Y1).
3.
Partially it can be concluded that Environmental Challenge (X3)
has a positive and significant effect on increasing Competitiveness (Y1).
4.
Partially, it can be concluded that Global Challenge (X1) has
a positive and significant effect on increasing Human Resource Performance (Y2).
5.
Partially, it can be concluded that Managerial Challenge (X2)
has a positive and significant effect on increasing Human Resource Performance
(Y2).
6.
Partially it can be concluded that Environmental Challenge (X3)
has a positive and significant effect on increasing Human Resource Performance
(Y2).
7.
Global Challenge (X1), Managerial Challenge (X2),
and Environmental Challenge (X3) simultaneously affect the increase
in competitiveness
Global Challenge (X1), Managerial Challenge
(X2), and Environmental Challenge (X3) simultaneously
affect the improvement of Human Resource Performance
REFERENCES
Abilitie.
(2022). Coaching And Communication Practice For People Managers.
Arikunto,
Suharsimi. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta:
Rineka Cipta.
Chadhiq,
Umar. (2006). Tantangan Kompetisi Global Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Tuntutan
Pengembangan Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia. Akses: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis,
1(2), 137�146.
Garaika,
& Darmanah. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Matondang,
Zulkifli. (2009). Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Suatu Instrumen Penelitian. Jurnal
Tabularasa Pps Unimed, 6(1).
Mulyani,
Ninuk. (2002). Tantangan Perusahaan Di Indonesia Dalam Menghadapi Persaingan
Global. Jurnal Widya Manajemen & Akuntansi, 2(3).
Noe,
R., Hollenbeck, J., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. (2006). Human Resources
Management: Gaining A Competitive Advantage, Tenth Global Edition. New
York: Ma: Mcgraw-Hill Education.
Orssatto,
R. J. (2001). Environmental Challenges In Organizations. International
Encyclopedia Of The Social & Behavioral Sciences.
Pio,
Omega Gratia Anita Karisoh Riane Johnly, & Asaloei, Sandra Ingried. (2016).
Pengaruh Praktek Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Terhadap Keberlanjutan
Perusahaan Pt. Manado Sejati Perkasa Oleh. 1�7.
Sugiono,
Noerdjanah, & Wahyu, Afrianti. (2020). Uji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Alat
Ukur Sg Posture Evaluation. Jurnal Keterapian Fisik, 5(1), 1�61.
Sugiyono.
(2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif,. Kualitatif, Dan
R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Wardani,
Sulistyo, & Permatasari, Rita Intan. (2022). Pengaruh Pengembangan Karier
Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Prestasi Kerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil (Pns) Staf Umum
Bagian Pergudangan Penerbangan Angkatan Darat (Penerbad) Di Tangerang. Jurnal
Ilmiah M-Progress, 12(1), 13�25.
Warsono.
(2017). Pengaruh Globalisasi Terhadap Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Majalah
Manajemen Dan Bisnis Ganesha, 1(1), 66.
Widi,
Ristya. (2011). Uji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Dalam Penelitian Epidemiologi
Kedokteran Gigi. Stomatognatic (J.K.G. Unej) Vol., 8(1), 27�34.
Yusuf,
Muhammad. (2017). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Tekanan Ketaatan Dan Kompleksitas Tugas
Terhadap Audit Judgment. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 13(01).
Copyright holders:
Sulhan Manaf (2022)
First publication
right:
AJEMB � American Journal of Economic
and Management Business