American Journal of Economic and Management
Business
e-ISSN: 2835-5199
Vol. 4 No. 1 January 2025
The Influence of Work from
Home and Work Life Balance on Job Performance (A Case Study at PT Rata
Indonesia) �
Natalia
Christy1*, Dian Indiyati2
Universitas Telkom, Indonesia
Emails: [email protected],
Abstract
Human resources
play a crucial role in an organization or company. This is because human
resources contribute to the organization's ability to achieve its desired
goals. In this context, human resources refer to employees. A factor that can
enhance the growth of an organization or company is by evaluating employee
performance. Organizations or companies must pay attention to work methods and
work-life balance in relation to their operations. Changes in employee work
methods can improve job performance and lead to satisfying results. Work-life
balance also needs to be managed by employees, as it can impact their job
performance. The aim of this study is to assess the levels of work from home,
work-life balance, and job performance among employees at PT Rata Indonesia.
The research method used is quantitative, with data presented through
descriptive analysis techniques. Data collection was conducted using a
questionnaire. This study employed a Likert scale with a total of 30
statements. The population of this study consists of 129 employees, and the
sample was selected using non-probability sampling with a saturated sampling
technique, where the sample includes the entire population. Enter the
descriptive results of the influence of work from home and work life balance
has a positive and significant effect on the job performance of PT Rata
Indonesia employees. Meanwhile, work from home is in the good category and work
life balance is in the good category and job performance is in the
moderate category.
Keywords: Work From home, Work Life
Balance, Job Performance
INTRODUCTION
In the era of
technological advancement and following the COVID-19 pandemic, companies face
new challenges in maintaining competitiveness in an increasingly dynamic
business environment
The shift to
digital operations and the rise of hybrid work models brought about by the
pandemic have added layers of complexity to managing employee performance
At PT Rata
Indonesia, which is headquartered in Jakarta with clinics in major cities
across the country, the KPI standard for employees includes resolving a minimum
of 180 tickets and a maximum of 200 within a response time of 15 minutes per
ticket. Despite these benchmarks, recent data indicate a decline in employee
performance
The importance
of this research lies in its ability to provide actionable insights into
managing employee performance in the digital and post-pandemic era
These findings
underscore that performance issues, work-from-home arrangements, and work-life
balance challenges are not unique to PT Rata Indonesia but are reflective of
broader trends impacting organizations in various industries. Understanding
these factors is critical for developing strategies to improve employee
performance in the digital and post-pandemic era
Based on these
phenomena, this research aims to examine the influence of work-from-home
practices and work-life balance on employee performance at PT Rata Indonesia
RESEARCH METHOD
This research employs a quantitative approach with a
descriptive method. The study was conducted at PT Rata Indonesia, a digital
startup specializing in health and aesthetics, which has been operating for six
years. The research spanned three months, from October to December 2024. It
focused on examining the relationships among key variables: work from home
(WFH), work-life balance (WLB), and job performance (JP). The research
population consisted of all 129 employees of PT Rata Indonesia, with a saturated
sampling technique employed, meaning the entire population was used as the
research sample.
Data collection was conducted using a questionnaire
consisting of 30 statements rated on a Likert scale of 1-5 (from strongly
disagree to strongly agree). The research variables were defined as WFH (X1),
WLB (X2), and JP (Y). Data analysis was performed using Structural Equation
Modeling (SEM) through the SmartPLS software. The validity and reliability of
the instrument were assessed using convergent factor analysis, with factor
loadings > 0.70 and an AVE > 0.50. Additionally, Cronbach's alpha and
composite reliability values met the reliability criteria, both being ≥
0.70. To enhance the clarity and transparency of the methods, the study could
include a more detailed explanation of the operational definitions of the
variables, the data collection procedures, and the assumptions considered in
the SEM analysis. These refinements would provide a stronger methodological
foundation and further support the research findings
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
The object of this research
is all employees of PT Rata Indonesia with a total of 129 employees. Sampling
using non probability sampling technique with saturated sampling technique. The
sample that can be selected as respondents in this study are 129 employees of
PT Rata Indonesia. Furthermore, each of these variables is measured by a number
of indicators through a survey. Data is collected through surveys distributed
to employees. Each question provided 5 answer options where score 1 for
strongly disagree and score 5 for strongly agree
Validity and Reliability Test Results
Table 1. Validity and
Reliability Test Results
Variables |
Indicator |
Load Factors |
Average Variance Extracted (AVE) Test |
Cronbach's Alpha Test |
Composite Reliability Test |
Work
From Home (XI) |
X1.1 |
0,724 |
0,665 (Valid) |
0,955 (Accepted) |
0,960 (Reliable) |
X1.2 |
0,733 |
||||
X1.3 |
0,788 |
||||
X1.4 |
0,782 |
||||
X1.5 |
0,791 |
||||
X1.6 |
0,804 |
||||
X1.7 |
0,896 |
||||
X1.8 |
0,900 |
||||
X1.9 |
0,845 |
||||
X1.10 |
0,864 |
||||
X1.11 |
0,853 |
||||
X1.12 |
0,786 |
||||
Work
Life Balance (X2) |
X2.1 |
0,840 |
0,746 (Valid) |
0,932���� ���(Accepted) |
0,946 (Reliable) |
X2.2 |
0,882 |
||||
X2.3 |
0,832 |
||||
X2.4 |
0,896 |
||||
X2.5 |
0,904 |
||||
X2.6 |
0,824 |
||||
Job
Performance (Y) |
Y1.1 |
0,916 |
0,737 (Valid) |
0,967 (Accepted) |
0,971 (Reliable) |
Y1.2 |
0,909 |
||||
Y1.3 |
0,913 |
||||
Y1.4 |
0,894 |
||||
Y1.5 |
0,853 |
||||
Y1.6 |
0,875 |
||||
Y1.7 |
0,920 |
||||
Y1.8 |
0,904 |
||||
Y1.9 |
0,867 |
||||
Y1.10 |
0,768 |
||||
Y1.11 |
0,720 |
||||
Y1.12 |
0,733 |
Source:
Processed Researcher Data, 2024
All indicators loading factor> 0.70 and
AVE value greater than> 0.5 so that all indicators are said to be valid or
have convergent validity. The variables in this�� research��
also have�� values ≥ 0.7,
which means they have met the criteria��
Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability.
Hypothesis Test Results
Table 2. Hypothesis Test Results
Hypotheses |
Original Sample
(O) |
Sample Mean (M) |
(STDEV) |
T-Statistics |
P Values |
X1� Y |
0,463 |
0,466 |
0,059 |
7,815 |
0,000 |
X2� Y |
0,160 |
0,169 |
0,079 |
2,026 |
0,043 |
Source:
Processed Researcher Data, 2024
R-Square
Table 3. R-Square value
Variables |
R |
Adjusted
R-Square����� |
Job Performance
(Y) |
0.283 |
0,272 |
Source:
Processed Researcher Data (2024)
The
R Square value for the Job Performance (Y) construct is 0.283, while the
Adjusted R Square value is 0.272. The R Square value of 0.283 indicates that
28.3% of the variance in the Job Performance (Y) construct can be explained by
the exogenous variables in the model.
Q-Square
Table 4. Q-Square values
Variables |
SSO SSE Q2 |
Work From Home
(X1) |
1548,000
1548,000 |
Work Life
Balance (X2) |
774,000 774,000 |
Job Performance
(Y) |
1548,000.1233,978
0,203 |
Source:
Processed Researcher Data (2024)
Indicating that the model was able to
explain about 20.3% of the variability in the endogenous variable Y better than
using only the average prediction.
Research Urgency
Significant changes in work patterns due
to the COVID-19 pandemic have prompted many companies, including PT Rata
Indonesia, to implement WFH
Causes
of the Problem
�From the data processed, it was found that
employee job performance decreased by 2.4% in 2021-2022 and 2.7% in 2022-2023.
The main factors influencing this decline are:
1) Dependence
on technology: Internet connection interruptions and lack of work devices.
2) Work
stress: Home environment that is not conducive to work.
3) Time
management: Difficulty dividing time between work and personal matters.
Solutions
and Implications
The
analysis results show that:
WFH (X1) has a significant influence on JP
with a T-statistic value of 7.815 (p < 0.000). This indicates that WFH
flexibility can increase employee efficiency if supported by adequate work
tools. WLB (X2) has a positive effect on JP with a T-statistic value of 2.026
(p < 0.043). The implementation of programs that support work-life balance,
such as flexible working hours and family-friendly leave, can increase employee
satisfaction.
Overall,
the research model has an R-Square value of 0.283, which indicates that 28.3%
of JP variation can be explained by the WFH and WLB variables. In addition, the
Q2 value of 0.203 indicates that the research model has a fairly good
predictive ability.
Comparison
with Previous Research
This study is consistent with the findings
of Bloom et al.
Impact and Recommendations The positive
impacts of effective WFH and WLB implementation include:
1) Improved
employee well-being: Reduced stress levels, increased motivation, and better
health.
2) Improved
company productivity: More consistent and high quality work output.
Recommendations
for PT Rata Indonesia are:
1) Strengthen
the digital infrastructure to support WFH.
2) Provide
time management training for employees.
3) Implement
a consistent work-life balance program.
CONCLUSION
�� Empirical findings suggest that factors such
as technology, working time, and work-life balance significantly influence the
effectiveness of WFH. Therefore, companies must provide sufficient
technological support, optimize resource allocation, and manage working hours
effectively to ensure productivity. By taking a strategic role in setting clear
objectives, delivering adequate training, evaluating performance regularly, and
fostering effective communication, companies can enhance overall employee
performance. Furthermore, promoting a healthy work-life balance has been shown
to improve employee well-being, alleviate stress, and boost job satisfaction
and performance. Consequently, it is crucial for companies to implement
policies and provide resources that empower employees to achieve work-life
balance, ultimately driving greater productivity and sustainable employee
well-being in the long term.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Carrizosa,
E., Nogales-G�mez, A., & Romero Morales, D. (2016). Strongly agree or
strongly disagree?: Rating features in Support Vector Machines. Information
Sciences, 329, 256�273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.09.031
Christy,
N., & Indiyati, D. (2024). The Influence of Work From Home and Work-Life
Balance on Job Performance in Employees (Case Study at PT Rata Indonesia). Return:
Study of Management, Economic and Bussines, 3(10), 810�828.
Collins,
A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2016). Design research: Theoretical and
methodological issues. In Design-Based Research (pp. 15�42). Psychology
Press.
De
Vos, S., Bockel-Rickermann, C., Van Belle, J., & Verbeke, W. (2024).
Predicting Employee Turnover: Scoping and Benchmarking the State-of-the-Art. Business
& Information Systems Engineering, 1�20.
Even,
A. M., & Christiansen, B. (2023). Enhancing employee engagement and
productivity in the post-pandemic multigenerational workforce. IGI Global.
Fabian,
C., Han, M., Bjerkvig, R., & Niclou, S. P. (2021). Novel facets of
glioma invasion (pp. 33�64). https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ircmb.2020.08.001
Hopkins,
J., & Bardoel, A. (2023). The future is hybrid: how organisations are
designing and supporting sustainable hybrid work models in post-pandemic
Australia. Sustainability, 15(4), 3086.
Kelliher,
C., Richardson, J., & Boiarintseva, G. (2019). All of work? All of life?
Reconceptualising work‐life balance for the 21st century. Human
Resource Management Journal, 29(2), 97�112.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12215
Mahdi,
O. R., & Nassar, I. A. (2021). The business model of sustainable
competitive advantage through strategic leadership capabilities and knowledge
management processes to overcome covid-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(17),
9891.
Marr,
B. (2015). Big Data: Using SMART big data, analytics and metrics to make
better decisions and improve performance. John Wiley & Sons.
Palmucci,
D. N., Giovando, G., & Vincurova, Z. (2025). The post-Covid era: digital
leadership, organizational performance and employee motivation. Management
Decision.
Saura,
J. R., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Zegarra Salda�a, P. (2022). Exploring the
challenges of remote work on Twitter users� sentiments: From digital
technology development to a post-pandemic era. Journal of Business Research,
142, 242�254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.052
Utami,
A. D., Dewi, A. S. S. C., & Yudhiantoro, D. (2020). The strategy of a book
publisher during the pandemic: A case study from Deepublish. Sebelas Maret
Business Review, 6(1), 15�25.
Wiradendi
Wolor, C. (2020). The importance of work-life balance on employee performance
millennial generation in Indonesia. Journal of Critical Reviews.
Copyright holders:
Natalia
Christy, Dian Indiyati (2025)
First publication
right:
AJEMB � American
Journal of Economic and Management Business