American Journal of Economic and Management
Business
p-ISSN: XXXX-XXXX
�e-ISSN: 2835-5199
Vol.
3 No. 12 December 2024
The Influence of
Product Quality, Sales Promotion, and Price on Purchase Intention: A Case Study
of Indihome Users in Palembang After FMC (Fixed Mobile Convergence)�
Dyandra
Dwi Arifia1*, Indrawati2
1,2Universitas Telkom, Indonesia
Emails: [email protected]
Abstract
The advancement
of telecommunications in Indonesia provides substantial and meaningful benefits
for the Indonesian people. The telecommunications industry in Indonesia is one
of the fastest-growing sectors in Asia. This study aims to analyze customer
feedback on telecommunication service users following the fixed mobile convergence
transformation implemented by Telkom and Telkomsel. The research adopts a
quantitative approach, utilizing a survey of 320 respondents selected through a
non-probability purposive sampling method, focusing on individual Telkomsel
telecommunications service users at GraPARI Palembang City. The data were
analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with the Partial Least Square
(PLS) technique to evaluate the model and test the hypotheses. The findings
reveal that product quality, sales promotion, and price are all categorized as
high. Moreover, these factors have a significant positive influence on buying
interest, accounting for 50.1% of the variance. This indicates that higher
product quality leads to increased buying interest, improved sales promotion
enhances consumer engagement, and well-placed pricing strategies elevate
customer interest in Indihome Telkomsel One. These results underline the
critical role of product quality, sales promotions, and pricing strategies in
driving consumer buying interest, providing actionable insights for
telecommunications service providers. Companies like Telkom and Telkomsel can
leverage these findings to refine their marketing strategies, focusing on
enhancing product offerings, developing targeted promotions, and implementing
competitive pricing to sustain and expand their market presence in the
fast-evolving telecommunications industry in Indonesi.
Keywords: product quality; price; purchase
interest; sales promotion
INTRODUCTION
In the current
era of rapid development of information and communication technology, where
technology is closely related and affects all aspects of human life regardless
of space and time, and from various groups ranging from children, adolescents,
to adults
The more
developed telecommunications progress in Indonesia, the better it will fulfill
the need for telecommunications to meet the daily needs of people who are
increasingly entering the modern era
The growing
internet penetration continues to encourage telecommunications companies,
including Telkomsel, to provide the best quality internet products and carry
out strategies to increase customer purchasing power
The official
transfer of Indihome's business to Telkomsel, which has been running since
Legal Day One on July 1, 2023, has made Indihome a stronger internet provider
with integrated value so that it has a better image in the market. Quality
improvement at Indihome is expected to increase customer satisfaction, which in
turn can be a force for Indihome's buying interest
RESEARCH METHODS
The type of research
conducted is descriptive research with a quantitative approach. The data
collection technique used in this study is the distribution of questionnaires
directly by the author to Indihome customers at GraPARI in the Palembang area,
who are the target respondents. The population in this study comprises all
Indihome customers at GraPARI Palembang City. The sample is determined using
the Non-probability Sampling method, which does not provide equal opportunities
for each element of the population to be selected as a sample member
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
In this
study, SmartPLS was used to conduct two types of model testing, namely the
measurement model (outer model) and the structural model (inner model). The
process begins with testing the measurement model, which aims to determine
validity and reliability. This model links reflective indicators with latent
variables using three measurement methods
Measurement
Model (Outer Model) Testing
The measurement model measurement model
(outer model) is a model that connects latent variables with manifest variables
The following is the data obtained from
respondents through a questionnaire in this study processed using SmartPLS
4.1.0.8 and stated with the following results:
Figure 1. Outer
Model Results
Source: Data processing results, 2024
Validity
Test
The validity test is a measuring
instrument that is tested for the level of effectiveness of the measuring media
in obtaining valid data
Table 1. Convergent Validity Test
Variables |
Dimensions |
Item |
Factor loading |
Description |
Product Quality (X1) |
Performance |
QP1 |
0.846 |
Valid |
QP2 |
0.749 |
Valid |
||
Reliability |
QP3 |
0.767 |
Valid |
|
QP4 |
0.752 |
Valid |
||
Conformance |
QP5 |
0.838 |
Valid |
|
QP6 |
0.824 |
Valid |
||
QP7 |
0.823 |
Valid |
||
QP8 |
0.869 |
Valid |
||
Durability |
QP9 |
0.779 |
Valid |
|
QP10 |
0.775 |
Valid |
||
Perceived Quality |
QP11 |
0.771 |
Valid |
|
QP12 |
0.780 |
Valid |
||
Sales Promotion (X2) |
Prices Packs |
PO1 |
0.811 |
Valid |
PO2 |
0.805 |
Valid |
||
PO3 |
0.816 |
Valid |
||
Rebates |
PO4 |
0.740 |
Valid |
|
PO5 |
0.804 |
Valid |
||
PO6 |
0.819 |
Valid |
||
Point of sale display |
PO7 |
0.763 |
Valid |
|
PO8 |
0.743 |
Valid |
||
PO9 |
0.772 |
Valid |
||
Price (X3) |
Price affordability |
PR1 |
0.806 |
Valid |
PR2 |
0.772 |
Valid |
||
Price affordability of product quality |
PR3 |
0.775 |
Valid |
|
PR4 |
0.781 |
Valid |
||
Affordability of benefits |
PR5 |
0.787 |
Valid |
|
PR6 |
0.765 |
Valid |
||
Price affordability of competitiveness |
PR7 |
0.758 |
Valid |
|
PR8 |
0.801 |
Valid |
||
Purchase Intention (Y) |
Transactional Interest |
PI1 |
0.789 |
Valid |
PI2 |
0.813 |
Valid |
||
Explorative Interest |
PI3 |
0.790 |
Valid |
|
Referential Interest |
PI4 |
0.769 |
Valid |
|
Interests Preferences |
PI5 |
0.754 |
Valid |
|
PI6 |
0.760 |
Valid |
Source: Data processing results, 2024
The table above provides information about
the loading factor value for each manifest variable; the loading factor value
of all indicators on latent variables shows> 0.6 so all indicators are
declared valid, and most of the values exceed 0.70 so that they are categorized
as having a high correlation.
Table 2. Average Variance Extracted (AVE)
Average
Variance Extracted (AVE) |
|
Product Quality (X1) |
0.638 |
Sales Promotion (X2) |
0.619 |
Price (X3) |
0.609 |
Purchase Intention (Y) |
0.607 |
Source: Data processing results, 2024
From the table presented it can be seen
that all variables have an Average Variance Extracted (AVE) value greater than
0.50, the value specified as the minimum limit. This shows that all variables
are valid in explaining their latent variables, which means that the use of
variables has met the established AVE criteria.
Table 3. Fornell-Lacker Criterion
Source: Data processing results, 2024
Based on the results of the table above
show that the loading value of each indicator item on its construct is greater
than the cross-loading value
Table 4. Factor Cross-Loading Test Results
X1 |
X2 |
X3 |
Y |
|
QP1 |
0.846 |
0.503 |
0.418 |
0.474 |
QP2 |
0.749 |
0.488 |
0.373 |
0.393 |
QP3 |
0.767 |
0.472 |
0.407 |
0.444 |
QP4 |
0.752 |
0.446 |
0.356 |
0.420 |
QP5 |
0.838 |
0.505 |
0.387 |
0.473 |
QP6 |
0.824 |
0.480 |
0.396 |
0.452 |
QP7 |
0.823 |
0.464 |
0.346 |
0.459 |
QP8 |
0.869 |
0.511 |
0.398 |
0.486 |
QP9 |
0.779 |
0.466 |
0.362 |
0.438 |
QP10 |
0.775 |
0.451 |
0.394 |
0.410 |
QP11 |
0.771 |
0.494 |
0.455 |
0.403 |
QP12 |
0.780 |
0.523 |
0.468 |
0.471 |
PO1 |
0.491 |
0.811 |
0.449 |
0.472 |
PO2 |
0.513 |
0.805 |
0.420 |
0.495 |
PO3 |
0.553 |
0.816 |
0.452 |
0.544 |
PO4 |
0.431 |
0.740 |
0.447 |
0.443 |
PO5 |
0.454 |
0.804 |
0.512 |
0.481 |
PO6 |
0.478 |
0.819 |
0.465 |
0.494 |
PO7 |
0.439 |
0.763 |
0.438 |
0.440 |
PO8 |
0.480 |
0.743 |
0.447 |
0.441 |
PO9 |
0.439 |
0.772 |
0.445 |
0.468 |
PR1 |
0.402 |
0.482 |
0.806 |
0.495 |
PR2 |
0.387 |
0.459 |
0.772 |
0.429 |
PR3 |
0.383 |
0.472 |
0.775 |
0.463 |
PR4 |
0.385 |
0.424 |
0.781 |
0.483 |
PR5 |
0.400 |
0.465 |
0.787 |
0.505 |
PR6 |
0.411 |
0.451 |
0.765 |
0.465 |
PR7 |
0.375 |
0.378 |
0.758 |
0.458 |
PR8 |
0.360 |
0.460 |
0.801 |
0.523 |
PI1 |
0.471 |
0.471 |
0.458 |
0.789 |
PI2 |
0.445 |
0.489 |
0.468 |
0.813 |
PI3 |
0.411 |
0.467 |
0.441 |
0.790 |
PI4 |
0.411 |
0.479 |
0.506 |
0.769 |
PI5 |
0.423 |
0.442 |
0.488 |
0.754 |
PI6 |
0.441 |
0.484 |
0.503 |
0.760 |
Source: Data processing results, 2024
Based on the PLS software results table
above, it can be seen that the cross loading factor correlation value of each
latent construct for the corresponding indicator is higher than other
constructs, so it can be concluded that the indicators used to measure latent
variables have met the requirements.
Table 5. HTMT Test Results
|
X1 |
X2 |
X3 |
Y |
Product Quality X1 |
|
|
|
|
Sales Promotion X2 |
0.647 |
|
|
|
Price X3 |
0.536 |
0.629 |
|
|
Purchase Intention Y |
0.612 |
0.674 |
0.687 |
|
Source: Data processing results, 2024
In
the table above, it can be seen that the HTMT value is below 0.85, so it can be
stated that all constructs pass the HTMT test.
Reliability
Test
Table 6. Cronbach's Alpha and Composite
Reliability Results
|
Cronbach's Alpha |
rho_A |
Composite Reliability |
X1 |
0.923 |
0.925 |
0.937 |
X2 |
0.904 |
0.906 |
0.926 |
X3 |
0.851 |
0.855 |
0.900 |
Y |
0.865 |
0.871 |
0.908 |
Source: Data processing results, 2024
Based on the table above, it can be seen
that all variables in this study have a score greater than 0.70 so that they
are reliable. Then each item in the validity and reliability test can be used
as an outer testing model to determine each indicator has a good consistency
and trust value.
Structural
Model Testing (Inner Model)
This structural modeling is to test the
effect of one latent variable on other latent variables. Testing is done by
looking at the path value to see whether the effect is significant or not based
on the t value of the path value (t value can be obtained by doing
boothstraping)
Figure 2.
Boothstraping
Source: Data processing results, 2024
R
square test
The influence of the dependent variable
can be displayed by the R-square value
Table 7. Results of R Squares
|
R Square |
Purchase Intention |
0,501 |
Source: Data processing results, 2024
Through the coefficient of determination
(R-square) value contained in the table above, it can be seen that the Rsquare
value of the Purchase Interest variable is 0.501, which indicates that the
Purchase Interest variable can be explained by 50.1% by the variables of
Product Quality, Sales Promotion and Price. While the remaining 49.9% can be
explained by other variables not examined.
Q2 Test/Blindfolding
Table
8. Construct Crossvalidated Redundancy
SSO |
SSE |
Q�
(=1-SSE/SSO) |
|
Product
Quality |
2560.000 |
2560.000 |
|
Sales
Promotion |
1920.000 |
1920.000 |
|
Price |
1280.000 |
1280.000 |
|
Purchase
Intention |
1280.000 |
692.131 |
0.459 |
Source: Data processing results, 2024
The qualified Q square value is greater
than 0 and vice versa. Based on the results of the above calculations, it can
be seen that the Q2 value for the variables of Product Quality, Sales
Promotion, and Price and Purchase Intention has a value greater than 0, so it
can be said that the model has predictive relevance.
Path Coefficient
The results of testing Path Coefficients
on each variable are shown in the table below:
Table 9. Path Coefficient
Influence |
Path
Coefficient |
Product Quality
-> Purchase Intention |
0.219 |
Sales Promotion
-> Purchase Intention |
0.274 |
Price ->
Purchase Intention |
0.347 |
Source: Data processing results, 2024
Based on the table above, it can be seen
that the smallest path value is the influence between product quality on
purchase intention of 0.219. While the largest path value is the influence
between price and purchase intention of 0.347.
F2 Effect Size Test
The F2 effect size value according to
Ghozali PLS (2020), if ≥ 0.02 indicates a small effect size, ≥ 0.15
indicates a medium effect size, and≥ 0.35 indicates a large effect size.
as follows:
�
Table 10. F2 Effect Size Test
Influence |
Effect Size Value |
Description |
Product Quality� Purchase Intention |
0.058 |
Small |
Sales Promotion� Purchase Intention |
0.080 |
Small |
Price� Purchase Intention |
0.153 |
Small |
Source: Data processing results, 2024
Based on the table above, it can be seen
that the price variable has the greatest influence on buying interest by having
an effect size value of 0.153.
Goodness of Fit Evaluation
To validate the overall model, Goodness of
Fit (GoF) is used. The following are the results of the Goodness of Fit
evaluation in this study:
Table 11. Goodness of Fit (GoF)
|
Saturated
Model |
Estimated
Model |
SRMR |
0.047 |
0.047 |
NFI |
0.835 |
0.835 |
Source: Processed data, 2024
Based on the results in Table 4.12, the
SRMR value of the model used in this study can be said to be good because the
SRMR value is less than 0.10, so the model is suitable for use in this study
(Ghozali, 2021: 78). Then the results of the NFI of the model used are close to
1, which means it has a fairly good fit (Ghozali, 2021: 78).
Product Quality on Indihome Telkomsel One Products
Based on descriptive analysis, the product
quality variable has an average of 1302.9 or 81.4%, which is in the interval of
68.01%-84%. From these data, it can be concluded that the product quality
variable is included in the "High" category
Sales Promotion on Indihome Telkomsel One Products
Based on descriptive analysis, the sales
promotion variable has an average of 1314.2 or 82.1%, which is in the interval
of 68.01%-84%. From this data, it can be concluded that the sales promotion
variable is included in the "High" category. The indicator with the
lowest score is the point of sale display dimension with question item X2.20,
"The standee in front of the GraPARI outlet counter displays promotions
that influence the intention to buy Indihome Telkomsel One products."
which scored 1293 or 78.4%.
Price on Indihome Telkomsel One Products
Based on descriptive analysis, the price
variable has an average of 1313.0 or 82.1%, which is in the interval of 68.01%-84%.
From this data, it can be concluded that the price variable is included in the
"High" category. The indicator with the lowest score is in the price
affordability dimension with question item X3.23, namely "I agree that the
discounted price given by Indihome Telkomsel One is the best price." it has
a score of 1288 with a percentage of 78.1%.
Purchase Interest in Indihome Telkomsel One Products
Based on the descriptive analysis, the
purchase interest variable has an average score of 1343.0, with a percentage of
83.9%, which falls within the interval of 68.01%�84%, categorizing it as
"High." The indicator with the lowest score is in the exploratory
interest dimension, specifically in question item Y.32: "I will look for
information about other Telkomsel One Indihome Products after using the
product," which scored 1323, representing 80.2%. These findings align with
previous research by [Author/Research], which emphasizes that high levels of
purchase interest are often influenced by customers' positive experiences with
the product and their tendency to explore similar offerings. This supports the
notion that exploratory interest, while crucial, may vary based on individual
preferences and the perceived value of additional products
CONCLUSION
Based on the
results of research conducted on the variables of product quality, sales
promotion, and price, it has been empirically proven that these variables play
a critical role in increasing buying interest in Indihome Telkomsel One product.
The implications for both practical and theoretical aspects should, therefore,
emphasize these three variables. The findings indicate that the price aspect
has the greatest influence on increasing buying interest, with a coefficient
value of 0.347 and a t-statistics value of 5.129. This is followed by sales
promotion with a coefficient value of 0.274 and a t-statistics value of 4.427,
and product quality with a coefficient value of 0.219 and a t-statistics value
of 3.496. Future research contributions should explore additional variables
beyond product quality, sales promotion, and price, such as customer
satisfaction, brand trust, or digital marketing strategies, to provide a more
comprehensive understanding of factors influencing purchase intention.
Furthermore, longitudinal studies could examine the sustainability of these
effects over time.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ab Hamid, M.
R., Sami, W., & Sidek, M. H. M. (2017). Discriminant validity assessment:
Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. Journal of
Physics: Conference Series, 890(1), 012163.
Adusei, M.,
& Gyapong, E. Y. (2017). The impact of macroeconomic variables on exchange
rate volatility in Ghana: The Partial Least Squares Structural Equation
Modelling approach. Research in International Business and Finance, 42,
1428�1444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.081
Asyraf, A.,
& Tricahyono, D. (2024). Optimization strategy for BTS development in the
3T region in responding to the challenges of the digital gap using a business
ecosystem approach: Case study of Telkomsel Regional Sulawesi. Journal of
Multidisciplinary Academic Business Studies, 1(3), 313�325.
Dastane, O.,
& Haba, H. F. (2023). What drives mobile MOOC�s continuous intention? A
theory of perceived value perspective. The International Journal of
Information and Learning Technology, 40(2), 148�163.
Fleuren, B. P.
I., van Amelsvoort, L. G. P. M., Zijlstra, F. R. H., de Grip, A., & Kant,
Ij. (2018). Handling the reflective-formative measurement conundrum: a
practical illustration based on sustainable employability. Journal of
Clinical Epidemiology, 103, 71�81.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.07.007
Hair, J. F.,
Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in
PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research,
109, 101�110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
Indrawati, P.
D. (2015). Metode penelitian manajemen dan bisnis konvergensi teknologi
komunikasi dan informasi. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Janna, N. M.,
& Herianto, H. (2021). Konsep uji validitas dan reliabilitas dengan
menggunakan SPSS.
Keeley, B.,
& Little, C. (2017). The State of the Worlds Children 2017: Children in
a Digital World. ERIC.
Latan, H.,
Noonan, R., & Matthews, L. (2017). Partial least squares path modeling. Partial
Least Squares Path Modeling: Basic Concepts, Methodological Issues and
Applications.
Marian, L.,
Chrysochou, P., Krystallis, A., & Th�gersen, J. (2014). The role of price
as a product attribute in the organic food context: An exploration based on
actual purchase data. Food Quality and Preference, 37, 52�60.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.05.001
Ozili, P. K.
(2023). The acceptable R-square in empirical modelling for social science
research. In Social research methodology and publishing results: A guide to
non-native english speakers (pp. 134�143). IGI global.
Streukens, S.,
& Leroi-Werelds, S. (2016). Bootstrapping and PLS-SEM: A step-by-step
guide to get more out of your bootstrap results. European Management
Journal, 34(6), 618�632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.06.003
Sudarmo, S.,
Arifin, A., Pattiasina, P. J., Wirawan, V., & Aslan, A. (2021). The Future
of Instruction Media in Indonesian Education: Systematic Review. Al-Ishlah:
Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(2), 1302�1311.
Tamon, T.
(2023). Unleashing Customer Delight: The Dynamic Interplay of Product
Excellence, Exceptional Service and Irresistible Prices. KINERJA: Jurnal
Manajemen Organisasi Dan Industri, 2(1), 83�93.
Wirtz, B. W.,
& Daiser, P. (2018). A meta-analysis of empirical e-government research
and its future research implications. International Review of
Administrative Sciences, 84(1), 144�163.
Yusuf, P. S.,
& Wibowo, S. A. (2022). Proposed Business Strategy for IndiHome Case
Study: PT Telkom Indonesia Tbk. International Journal of Current Science
Research and Review, 5(01), 203�211.
Copyright holders:
Dyandra Dwi
Arifias, Indrawati (2024)
First publication
right:
AJEMB - American
Journal of Economic and Management Business